With so much great technology on the market these days, it is easier to
record conversations than ever before, either over a land line, on a mobile
phone or even in-person with a hidden recording device.
Recorded
conversations (either tape or digital) are often very helpful in a variety of
scenarios. These audio recordings may assist in an investigation of employee
misconduct or in business or personal lawsuits, even in potential criminal
investigations.
It is very important, however, to make sure that any
recording, either of a phone conversation or an in-person conversation, complies
with federal and state laws. Otherwise, you may very well open yourself up to
criminal charges or civil suits. And it is unlikely that you will be legally
able to use the recording for your original purpose.
So, if you're
thinking about recording some phone calls or placing a voice activated recorder
in a room to record conversations, you'll need to take a look at the applicable
laws.
The first place to look is at the federal wiretapping statute, also
known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Federal law allows phone
calls (traditional, cellular and cordless) and other electronic communication to
be recorded with the consent of at least one party to the
conversation.
This means that if you are one of the people taking part in
the conversation, it can be recorded because one person (you) has consented to
the recording. If you are not taking part in the conversation, at least one of
the people in the conversation must know about and consent to the
recording.
You can't stop, however, after considering federal law and
assume that your recording passes muster. Each state and territory has its own
statutes regarding the recording of conversations. Most state wiretapping and
eavesdropping laws are based upon the federal law and allow recording with the
consent of one party to the conversation.
The 37 states which allow one
party consent recording of oral communications are: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New
York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West
Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
The District of Columbia also allows
people to record conversations with the consent of only one party. Nevada has a
one party consent statute but there is some question as to how the law should be
interpreted by the courts. It could be considered an all party consent
state.
The 12 states which definitely require all parties to a
conversation to consent before it can be recorded are: California, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New
Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.
In California, there is an
exception. You can record a conversation with the consent of only one party if
certain criminal activity (kidnapping, extortion, bribery or a violent felony)
is involved.
So, the basic rule is that it is illegal to record
conversations or communications in which you are not a participant, unless you
have consent of at least one, if not all, of the participants.
The
obvious exception to this general rule is that law enforcement officials can
seek permission from a court to perform no-consent wiretaps as part of a
criminal investigation. For the finer points of your own states laws and
requirements, you should always consult with an attorney.
0 comentarios:
Post a Comment